People, Industries, Client Stories, News. Search it Here.

  • About Us
  • Industries
  • Services
  • People
  • Insights
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Terms and Conditions
Search
Subscribe
Client Login
Friedman Alliance
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Menu
Friedman LLP
  • About Us
  • Industries
  • Services
  • People
  • Insights
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
About Us
  • Overview
  • Awards
  • Purpose and Values
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • DFK International
  • Friedman Gives Back
  • Women's Development Network
  • Merge With Us
  • Friedman Alliance
  • Client Experiences
Industries
  • Agriculture
  • Architecture & Engineering
  • Automotive
  • Cannabis
  • Construction
  • Digital Currency
  • Entertainment & Gaming
  • Financial Services
  • Health Care
  • Hospitality
  • Law Firms
  • Life Sciences
  • Manufacturing, Distribution & Retail
    • Consumer Products
    • Diamond & Jewelry
    • Fashion
  • Multimedia
  • Nonprofit
  • Real Estate
    • Affordable Housing
    • Owner/Developer
    • REITs
  • Restaurants
  • Technology
Services
  • Accounting, Audit & Assurance
    • Employee Benefit Plan Audits
  • Asia Practice
    • China Practice
    • 中国 业务
  • Business Development Advisory
  • COVID-19 Recovery and Growth Consulting
  • Cybersecurity Consulting | CyZen
  • Distressed Loan Workouts For Lenders and Borrowers
  • Economic & Statistical Consultants (Eco-Stat LLC)
  • Financial Recruiting Services
  • Forensic, Litigation & Valuation Services
    • Business Interruption Claims
    • Business Recovery
    • Divorce and Matrimonial
    • Economic Damage Analysis
    • Forensic Accounting and Fraud Investigation
    • Securities and Class Action
    • Valuation
  • Governance, Risk & Compliance
  • International Services
  • Outsourced Accounting
  • Public Company Services
  • Qualified Opportunity Zone Consulting
  • Tax
    • Corporate & Business Tax
    • Estate & Trust
    • Family Office
    • International Tax
    • Private Client
    • State & Local Tax (SALT)
    • Tax Controversy
    • Transfer Pricing
  • Transaction Advisory Services
    • Quality of Earnings
Careers
  • Campus Hires
  • Experienced Hires
Friedman LLP

PUBLICATION: July 16, 2021

SCOTUS Decides Not to Decide: Marijuana Edition

This Week In Tax
Processing...
Publication: This Week In Tax
Author: Michael Greenwald, MPPM, CPA, Business Tax Leader

The United States Supreme Court decided yet again not to intervene in a federal income tax case. It is not as surprising as we make it sound. The Supreme Court actually declines to hear the vast majority of cases presented to it.

Each year it receives approximately 10,000 petitions requesting a writ of certiorari but accepts only 100 or so of them. It is harder to get heard by SCOTUS than to get into an Ivy League college. Unless the subject matter or petitioner is high profile, the general public rarely hears about cases SCOTUS declines to take.

This time the issue was enforcement of the tax code section that disallows certain tax deductions to businesses that sell federally controlled substances. While the sale of marijuana is legal in many states, it’s still a violation of federal law.

Over the past decade or so, federal enforcement of marijuana laws has been more or less absent. Since 2015, Congress has prohibited the Department of Justice from spending money prosecuting individuals who comply with state law — essentially making sure it doesn’t prevent states from legalizing marijuana. You can understand why state-legal marijuana businesses would think they should be entitled to take the same tax deductions as any other retailers and why.

Two cases were presented to the Court. They denied certiorari to one but sent the other back for a final discussion in conference. Ultimately, they rejected the chance to review the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) enforcement action in the second case as well. You may ask why is this important if the Supreme Court didn’t do anything and the lower courts have allowed the IRS to continue auditing marijuana dispensaries and disallowing deductions?

What is unusual about this particular case is that the most conservative Justice of the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, wrote a five-page statement denying certiorari and used that statement to suggest that the federal ban “on intrastate use or cultivation of marijuana may no longer be necessary or proper.” In the statement, he discusses not only the unequal treatment under the tax code but also federal banking regulations and even firearm laws. The statement, which can be read here, is quite interesting. No current action needs to be taken, but the times they are a changin’.

  • Share

Insights

Insights

Back to Insights

Related Industries

Related Industries
  • Cannabis

Related Services

Related Services
  • Tax Services

People

People
  • Michael J. Greenwald
    Michael J. Greenwald
    MPPM, CPA, Partner, Business Tax Leader
    mgreenwald@friedmanllp.comp212.842.7513
    f212.842.7001

Subscribe

Subscribe

© 2022 Friedman LLP All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Terms and Conditions

Designed and developed by Greenfield/Belser Ltd.

DFK International